No announcement yet.
StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty review
- activision (37)
- adventure (68)
- bad company 2 (47)
- battlefield (46)
- battlefield 3 (39)
- beta (66)
- bethesda (36)
- bioware (27)
- blizzard (52)
- call of duty (29)
- dice (67)
- e3 2011 (27)
- ea games (101)
- First Person and Action (283)
- fps (143)
- Hardware and Industry (40)
- mmo (48)
- Racing and Flight (39)
- rpg (110)
- starcraft 2 (35)
- steam (121)
- strategy (48)
- trailer (33)
- valve (46)
- video (52)
The first two instalments of the Mass Effect series are widely considered to be some of the best games ever made. Certainly they rank among the greatest RPGs. With the outstanding quality of their story telling, and their stunning audio and visuals, they set the bar so high for the third instalment that some began to wonder if disappointment was inevitable. Thankfully the doubters have been proven wrong, as with Mass Effect 3 Bioware has not only cleared the bar, but they raised it several notches before doing so. The game is not without its problems. There are numerous visual glitches, importing character appearance from Mass Effect 2 saves doesn't work, one of the quest lines in the 0-day DLC crashes the game (though can be completed with a bit of well timed button mashing), and like all Bioware titles...11-03-12, 01:55 AM
Skyrim is the latest installment in the Elder Scrolls franchise, and after over 40 hours of play, we finally feel we have seen enough of the game to justify a balanced review. While it received almost universal praise from critics in early reviews, Skyrim is not a game without issues. But whatever its flaws, the scale of the world is undeniably impressive, with enough content to rival many MMOs. Almost unbearably slow to start, you are eventually introduced to a world filled with the type of adventure and drama that a good RPG needs. The High King is dead, murdered, the land gripped by civil war, and an ancient evil has returned to rain fire and ice from the sky. What more could you want? "Skyrim is a world full of life, adventure, and more content than you can shake an enchanted stick at." Better model animation perhaps. Character animation and lighting is a real let down, only marginally better than Fallout 3. And for a Bethesda ...17-11-11, 06:29 PM
2011 brings us Modern Warfare 3, the third in the series and the eighth major Call of Duty title. In it you will as and alongside numerous characters in numerous units, some returning from previous games, on a mission to bring an end to a global conflict that has been masterminded by a single ruthless psychopath. If it were a film it would be a popcorn flick at best and at worst inexcusable b-grade rubbish. But because of its delivery as a game, like the previous Modern Warfare titles, it's yet again quite a spectacular all-out action interactive experience. But is it as good as its predecessors? "The set-pieces are as Hollywood as ever, with some absolutely thrilling plane crashes and train derailments." Looking at the plot, there's a lot of talking to create it, which breaks up and fills-in what would otherwise be a plot-less, soulless shooting gallery. There's no real story told by your actions, which include almost e...10-11-11, 03:05 PM
RAGE is the latest title from the studio that pioneered the first person shooter, six years after their last major release. In it you awake as the lone survivor of an "Ark", a century after 2029's Aphophis asteroid impact turned the planet into a wasteland. The plot is unashamedly unoriginal, but it's not the just the world of RAGE that id Software has been working on for half a decade. "Taking heads off with the boomerang-like Wingstick might have been my most satisfying exploit." RAGE is based on the new id Tech 5, a flexible cross-platform engine designed to run across all major gaming systems using the same assets. First impressions of this new engine weren't smashing however, delivering a few decisive crashes to desktop and a ton of texture popping when it got going. Owners of AMD graphics cards had it even worse, experiencing truly awful performance, if they were able to run the game at all. But the real disappointment for me wasn't those performance issues, rather the c...11-10-11, 06:27 PM
F1 2011 is Codemasters' second officially licensed Formula 1 title, delivering a number of season oriented updates such KERS and DRS, as well as co-op multiplayer, 16 human grid places in online races and the introduction of the safety car. The question on everyone's mind is: are these improvements enough to warrant another $50 purchase just 12 months after the excellent F1 2010? I've had a bit of a system upgrade since last year and to my pleasant surprise F1 2011 was very accommodating. Without any prompting the correct triple monitor resolution was selected for my three Alienware AW2310 displays, as was the 120Hz refresh rate. The menus are intelligently presented on the middle screen, and the game automatically switches to span all of them come race time. Importantly, the HUD remains centered while in the car too. The default field of vision is far too high across three screens, however. Without any options to change it in...20-09-11, 06:21 PM
Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad has been out for around about 12 hours now, and I've been stuck into multiplayer with a few Gamers-Underground.com forum goers during the evening. If you were waiting on another opinion or two before a purchase, read on; I've got one for you along with a review score for RO2's multiplayer. Despite having no expectations for this title, my first impression of the game wasn't good; a server browser that would crash me to desktop, and refused to refresh after a failed server connection. I gritted my teeth as I finally began loading into a local games.on.net server, and quickly crossed my fingers in the hope that the experience would improve once in-game. "You have to aim well from distance, or risk your life in a close combat quarters fire fight where a single shot is enough to kill - it can be very tense stuff."After making my way in I was greeted with what I ...14-09-11, 09:23 PM
StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty reviewIt has been almost 12 years since StarCraft, and the Blizzard hype machine has been in full swing since the announcement of its sequel, StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty, at BlizzCon all those years ago. Well the Hyperion has finally landed, and we've spent the last week hammering away at the single player campaign.
Forgoing sleep - and the glory of multiplayer combat - I played through the campaign from start to finish, and then (heroically) went back for more, exploring all the optional and alternative content. Does it live up to the hype? Has the long, long wait been worth it? In short, yes. Yes it has.
I am a child of the 8-bit era, and have long held the belief that graphics do not make a game. SC2 has taught me just how wrong I was.
While the actual game play graphics are not exactly ground breaking, the creative use of lighting, and the wonderfully rich background imagery all come together to make a very well rounded experience that adds just the right amount of atmosphere - without requiring a water cooled super computer to play it.
"Does it live up to the hype? Has the long, long wait been worth it? In short, yes. Yes it has. "
But the game play graphics are only part of the picture where the campaign is concerned. The campaign is made by cut scenes and the campaign management interface, which is an explorable environment loosely in the style of old point-and-click adventures.
The cut scenes are everything I have come to expect from Blizzard, and more. While most of the cut scenes are shot using the 3D engine of the campaign management environment, they are so polished that they rank among the best I have seen in the last few years.
And then there are the pre-rendered cut scenes. Few and far between, but truly stunning. For a great example of the cinematics - without spoilers - check out the Ghosts of the Past trailer, which is a mash up of many of the in game cut scenes, both pre-rendered and otherwise.
Like the original, StarCraft 2 is a very well balanced RTS, with every unit having a counter, and both strong defensive and offensive play. But let's be honest, if you have played an RTS in the last 10 years, you pretty much know what you are in for - particularly if you played the original.
So rather than focus on the core elements of the game play, I am instead going to focus on those that add to the playability of the campaign.
Many RTS campaigns are quite dry. You build up your army and base until you are powerful enough to destroy your enemy's base. Sometimes you get the odd covert mission thrown in, but it's nothing special. SC2 tries to mix it up a bit, and (frankly) to my surprise succeeds in make each mission feel different to the last. Rather than just grinding through the missions to unlock the cinematics - like I find myself doing in most RTS campaigns - I actually found myself enjoying the challenges each mission presented.
To add a bit more spice and re-playability to the campaign, there are three interesting side features:
Unlockable Units: Through out the campaign you will have a choice of missions available to play. Each mission will generally unlock a new unit. This introduces a bit of choice and strategy at the campaign level: should I do this mission without that unit? Or should I unlock that unit first?
Mercenaries & Unit Upgrades: Each mission will also earn you credits that you can spend on unit upgrades and even on mercenaries - limited use, extremely powerful units. You will not earn enough credits during the campaign to buy every upgrade, so once again it adds some choice at the campaign level.
Technology Research: During most missions there will be optional objectives that if completed will grant you research points. There are two types of research points, Protoss and Zerg, that correspond to two tech trees. Every 5 points you earn on a tree you will be able to choose one of two upgrades. Do you want to unlock the Planetary Fortress or the ability to build flame throwing turrets? Once again - well you get the picture - choice, choice, choice!
I could rant for hours about how wonderful I found the story, the cinematics, and what awesome work Blizzard has done in all the right places - instead I will try keep it simple.
The cinematics are very well done, and a satisfying reward to completing a mission. The story is enhanced by excellent characters, wonderful voice acting, and a nice mix of humor, drama, and outright corniness.
I found the missions themselves pleasantly challenging. They took me right to the edge of swearing and keyboard smashing, but didn't push me over.
I did have issues with the patcher flooding my poor little cheap modem to death, but that was the only serious bug I ran in to. The actual game play was very polished, and apart from a few Battle.Net hiccups effecting the achievements system, I ran in to no unnecessary frustrations once I was in the game and playing.
If you are a strategy fan, or love a good story, this game is well worth the money. It falls no shorter than being one of the greatest RTS games of all time.Posting comments is disabled.