No announcement yet.
Modern Warfare 3 review
- activision (37)
- adventure (68)
- bad company 2 (47)
- battlefield (46)
- battlefield 3 (39)
- beta (66)
- bethesda (36)
- bioware (27)
- blizzard (52)
- call of duty (29)
- dice (67)
- e3 2011 (27)
- ea games (101)
- First Person and Action (283)
- fps (143)
- Hardware and Industry (40)
- mmo (48)
- Racing and Flight (39)
- rpg (110)
- starcraft 2 (35)
- steam (121)
- strategy (48)
- trailer (33)
- valve (46)
- video (52)
The first two instalments of the Mass Effect series are widely considered to be some of the best games ever made. Certainly they rank among the greatest RPGs. With the outstanding quality of their story telling, and their stunning audio and visuals, they set the bar so high for the third instalment that some began to wonder if disappointment was inevitable. Thankfully the doubters have been proven wrong, as with Mass Effect 3 Bioware has not only cleared the bar, but they raised it several notches before doing so. The game is not without its problems. There are numerous visual glitches, importing character appearance from Mass Effect 2 saves doesn't work, one of the quest lines in the 0-day DLC crashes the game (though can be completed with a bit of well timed button mashing), and like all Bioware titles...11-03-12, 03:55 AM
Skyrim is the latest installment in the Elder Scrolls franchise, and after over 40 hours of play, we finally feel we have seen enough of the game to justify a balanced review. While it received almost universal praise from critics in early reviews, Skyrim is not a game without issues. But whatever its flaws, the scale of the world is undeniably impressive, with enough content to rival many MMOs. Almost unbearably slow to start, you are eventually introduced to a world filled with the type of adventure and drama that a good RPG needs. The High King is dead, murdered, the land gripped by civil war, and an ancient evil has returned to rain fire and ice from the sky. What more could you want? "Skyrim is a world full of life, adventure, and more content than you can shake an enchanted stick at." Better model animation perhaps. Character animation and lighting is a real let down, only marginally better than Fallout 3. And for a Bethesda ...17-11-11, 07:29 PM
2011 brings us Modern Warfare 3, the third in the series and the eighth major Call of Duty title. In it you will as and alongside numerous characters in numerous units, some returning from previous games, on a mission to bring an end to a global conflict that has been masterminded by a single ruthless psychopath. If it were a film it would be a popcorn flick at best and at worst inexcusable b-grade rubbish. But because of its delivery as a game, like the previous Modern Warfare titles, it's yet again quite a spectacular all-out action interactive experience. But is it as good as its predecessors? "The set-pieces are as Hollywood as ever, with some absolutely thrilling plane crashes and train derailments." Looking at the plot, there's a lot of talking to create it, which breaks up and fills-in what would otherwise be a plot-less, soulless shooting gallery. There's no real story told by your actions, which include almost e...10-11-11, 04:05 PM
RAGE is the latest title from the studio that pioneered the first person shooter, six years after their last major release. In it you awake as the lone survivor of an "Ark", a century after 2029's Aphophis asteroid impact turned the planet into a wasteland. The plot is unashamedly unoriginal, but it's not the just the world of RAGE that id Software has been working on for half a decade. "Taking heads off with the boomerang-like Wingstick might have been my most satisfying exploit." RAGE is based on the new id Tech 5, a flexible cross-platform engine designed to run across all major gaming systems using the same assets. First impressions of this new engine weren't smashing however, delivering a few decisive crashes to desktop and a ton of texture popping when it got going. Owners of AMD graphics cards had it even worse, experiencing truly awful performance, if they were able to run the game at all. But the real disappointment for me wasn't those performance issues, rather the c...11-10-11, 07:27 PM
F1 2011 is Codemasters' second officially licensed Formula 1 title, delivering a number of season oriented updates such KERS and DRS, as well as co-op multiplayer, 16 human grid places in online races and the introduction of the safety car. The question on everyone's mind is: are these improvements enough to warrant another $50 purchase just 12 months after the excellent F1 2010? I've had a bit of a system upgrade since last year and to my pleasant surprise F1 2011 was very accommodating. Without any prompting the correct triple monitor resolution was selected for my three Alienware AW2310 displays, as was the 120Hz refresh rate. The menus are intelligently presented on the middle screen, and the game automatically switches to span all of them come race time. Importantly, the HUD remains centered while in the car too. The default field of vision is far too high across three screens, however. Without any options to change it in...20-09-11, 07:21 PM
Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad has been out for around about 12 hours now, and I've been stuck into multiplayer with a few Gamers-Underground.com forum goers during the evening. If you were waiting on another opinion or two before a purchase, read on; I've got one for you along with a review score for RO2's multiplayer. Despite having no expectations for this title, my first impression of the game wasn't good; a server browser that would crash me to desktop, and refused to refresh after a failed server connection. I gritted my teeth as I finally began loading into a local games.on.net server, and quickly crossed my fingers in the hope that the experience would improve once in-game. "You have to aim well from distance, or risk your life in a close combat quarters fire fight where a single shot is enough to kill - it can be very tense stuff."After making my way in I was greeted with what I ...14-09-11, 10:23 PM
Modern Warfare 3 review2011 brings us Modern Warfare 3, the third in the series and the eighth major Call of Duty title. In it you will as and alongside numerous characters in numerous units, some returning from previous games, on a mission to bring an end to a global conflict that has been masterminded by a single ruthless psychopath.
If it were a film it would be a popcorn flick at best and at worst inexcusable b-grade rubbish. But because of its delivery as a game, like the previous Modern Warfare titles, it's yet again quite a spectacular all-out action interactive experience. But is it as good as its predecessors?
Looking at the plot, there's a lot of talking to create it, which breaks up and fills-in what would otherwise be a plot-less, soulless shooting gallery. There's no real story told by your actions, which include almost exclusively running through streets and shooting waves of enemies. Rather the plot is conveyed through the dialogue along the way. As usual, this approach works a charm in turning Modern Warfare 3 into yet another seemingly rich and well conceived tale of conflict.
"The set-pieces are as Hollywood as ever, with some absolutely thrilling plane crashes and train derailments."
The voice acting is generally good, both in-game and during cut scenes. My only issue on this subject would be the choice of voice casting with certain characters. Looking further into the audio, again it's of a high quality. While no Battlefield 3, which we're yet to publish our review of, it's nothing short of the excellence that we've come to expect from Modern Warfare and the Call of Duty series.
As I've already mentioned, you'll get to play with some returning Modern Warfare characters, such as Task Force 141 Captain John "Soap" MacTavish. I was excited to do so, and it's a great value-add for those who have finished the previous two installments. There are also a number of fan-serving tie-ins throughout the plot and cut-scenes which are sure to be appreciated.
Something I found particularly enjoyable was the diversity in battleground. From Manhattan to Prague, Paris, London and more. If you've spent any time in any of these locations you'll see that they've been recreated with some accuracy, and it really adds to the immersion and your emotional attachment to the mission at hand.
The string of missions that tie the campaign together are all short, sharp and explosive. The set-pieces are as Hollywood as ever, with some absolutely thrilling plane crashes and train derailments. None of it is at all believable of course, but if you're a sucker for adrenaline, turn your speakers up loud and you won't be disappointed.
The entire campaign took me just a fraction over 4 hours to complete. Before you get your panties in a twist, I'll reiterate my feeling yet again that this isn't a problem. I'll take four hours of quality over 24 hours of filler any day of the week. Go and see any two hour 3D movie with popcorn and a Coke and you have exactly the same value equation.
While the length didn't bother me, the content started to. As exciting and action packed it was, it is comprehensively just more of the same. The formula is getting old and I'm a little bitter about spending $60 on that basis alone. I expect more from every sequel but there's the feeling I didn't get that with Modern Warfare 3. I understand it's a winning formula, one that appeals to the mass-market, but I have to wonder how long they can keep doing this for.
A pet hate of mine is their mechanic to force a slower pace of play. Often you're asked to follow a soldier to a point. If you break away you're often automatically spotted even without having been seen, at which point an entire platoon's worth of bullets and fire lands on you from a place that doesn't exist. I wonder how quickly the game could have been completed otherwise.
My biggest gripe with Modern Warfare 3 was the engine. While other games continue to improve year-on-year, Modern Warfare has made only incremental improvements that just aren't keeping up. While it doesn't look any worse than previous Call of Duty games, it feels like it does because its competition looks comparatively so much better.
It does look better than Modern Warfare 2 however, which is thanks to the work they've done with the lighting. Everything else about it is a little embarrassing, such as trucks turning on a central axis while helicopters fly around in an unnatural fashion, as if they're on a wire. Paired with the underwhelming environmental effects the believability is sucked right out of certain scenes. Visually it's not all bad, but it's certainly hit-and-miss and certainly disappointing.
Without seeing some obvious and serious innovation next time, I really don't think that Activision deserve any more of your money when Modern Warfare 4 comes along. The future aside, I did have a lot of fun with Modern Warfare 3 and objectively I can't say it's not a good game. If you enjoyed the second, you'll probably enjoy this as well.Posting comments is disabled.