Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Best bet - long network cable/short phone cable or vice versa?

  1. #1
    I do all my own stunts. Bam Stroker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    713
    Liked
    91 times
    Points: 32,992, Level: 79
    Points: 32,992, Level: 79
    Achievements:
    Veteran (6+ years registered)Loved (50+ liked posts)First Class Tagger (tags posts a lot)

    Best bet - long network cable/short phone cable or vice versa?

    I've just moved in to a new place and although I'm still waiting to get my internets turned on I've realised I'm already facing my first set up issue, namely the distance between the telephone socket and where my PC will be set up.

    I'm faced with a choice between:

    a) putting the ADSL modem next to the computer and running a 15m phone cord to the phone socket with a short network cable to the PC:

    PHONE SOCKET ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MODEM --- PC

    b) putting the ADSL modem next to the phone socket, running a short phone cord to the socket and then a 15m network cable to the PC:

    PHONE SOCKET --- MODEM ----------------------------------------------------------------------- PC

    Am I facing any kind of connection reliability/sync speed issues if I use such a long phone cable? Or if I use a long network cable will it affect my speed that much?

    I'm currently leaning towards option B since it will give the busier parts of the house (loungeroom/kitchen) better WIFI coverage from the base station but if someone tells me that having a long network cable is way worse than a long phone cord I might reconsider.
    Last edited by Bam Stroker; 22-07-11 at 02:45 PM. Reason: added some WICKED SICK illustrative ASCII artwork

    Making a difference.

  2. #2
    Old school chad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    1,446
    Liked
    16 times
    Points: 13,889, Level: 51
    Points: 13,889, Level: 51
    Achievements:
    Veteran (6+ years registered)
    Cat 5 is pretty cheap, cheaper than phone cable if you buy it from anywhere else than dick smith.
    This post contains tracers of humor and nuts.

  3. #3
    Harbinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    4,297
    Liked
    133 times
    Points: 25,603, Level: 70
    Points: 25,603, Level: 70
    Achievements:
    Veteran (6+ years registered)Loved (50+ liked posts)Second Class Tagger (tags posts a bit)
    Ethernet won't even notice a 15m cable. It's specced to work up to 100m without collisions.

  4. #4
    Old school Lothar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Darwin
    Posts
    1,828
    Liked
    20 times
    Points: 20,130, Level: 61
    Points: 20,130, Level: 61
    Achievements:
    Ring Leader (has created a group)Second Class Tagger (tags posts a bit)Veteran (6+ years registered)
    Awards:
    Socially Engaged (private messages a lot)
    Well if the long phone cable works and is easier for you than great! Just expect if you have issues to go back to short phone cord and longer ethernet.

    I have seen in past situations that running a long phone cord is absolutely fine however by the way that 15m cord would be possibly going through doors / areas prone to damage by been walked over or whatever.

    If it is just one device you could possibly do without cat-5 altogether. Wireless N in my house is all I use now and I do not notice any packet loss or reliability issues at all. If your in an area that is flooded with 2.4ghz devices you can get a reasonably cheep 5ghz wireless bridge for less than $140 or so.

  5. #5
    poke poke... is this on? Exalted BrAiN DaNcE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,622
    Liked
    28 times
    Points: 24,312, Level: 68
    Points: 24,312, Level: 68
    Achievements:
    Veteran (6+ years registered)
    phone cable isn't actually rated for data at all, so just by using one for ADSL you are technically breaking standards....

    Get the shortest phone cable you can live with, and use ethernet/wireless.

  6. #6
    Old school
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    darwin
    Posts
    1,702
    Liked
    10 times
    Points: 11,697, Level: 46
    Points: 11,697, Level: 46
    Achievements:
    Veteran (6+ years registered)
    Go option B)

    I have the best of both worlds I have a modem in bridge mode with a short phone cable and put my router where I want it hooked up.

  7. #7
    grandinferno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    3,048
    Liked
    53 times
    Points: 21,669, Level: 64
    Points: 21,669, Level: 64
    Achievements:
    Socialite (3+ friends)3+ years registeredSecond Class Tagger (tags posts a bit)Loved (50+ liked posts)Hyperactive!
    I concur. Long ethernet. Short phone cable. I believe most ISPs suggest your phone cable be shorter than 3m.

  8. #8
    I do all my own stunts. Bam Stroker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    713
    Liked
    91 times
    Points: 32,992, Level: 79
    Points: 32,992, Level: 79
    Achievements:
    Veteran (6+ years registered)Loved (50+ liked posts)First Class Tagger (tags posts a lot)
    Option B it is then. Cheers budjus!

    Making a difference.

  9. #9
    grandinferno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    3,048
    Liked
    53 times
    Points: 21,669, Level: 64
    Points: 21,669, Level: 64
    Achievements:
    Socialite (3+ friends)3+ years registeredSecond Class Tagger (tags posts a bit)Loved (50+ liked posts)Hyperactive!
    Ngah thought it was something but nudding look!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)