Dark Knight second biggest box office movie ever

27 public posts in this discussion.

Post 1

Quote:
The behemoth of summer was the Warner Bros. Batman sequel The Dark Knight, whose haul - $500-million and counting -- amounted to nearly one-eighth of overall Hollywood revenues. The Dark Knight passed Star Wars to rank No. 2 on the all-time domestic revenue chart, behind Titanic at $600.8-million.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080830.SUMMER30/TPStory/TPEntertainment/Movies/

Considering its continuing popularity at cinemas around the world, there's no doubt still a small chance for #1, too.

I saw it again tonight... and would happily shell out yet another "5 to see it a third time.

Post 2

...was so good. Serious.

Post 3

woo.

I definately liked this movie and Heath Ledger was awesome.

But to much pansy talking and stuff not enough action!!!

Post 4

I'm finally going to see it today. Not in Gold Class unfortunately, those sessions are still getting sold out 2-3 days in advance much to my surprise.

Post 5

Quote from SperO;352283:
But to much pansy talking and stuff not enough action!!!

Are you joking around? Taking the piss? The pacing, character building, and mix of action and drama was as close to perfect as it gets. I was thoroughly entertained without a single wandering thought for the entire 2 hours and 32 minutes... twice.

It seems the only culture to consider this film a throw-away is the Japanese - just 8.7 million in theatres after its first 3 weeks. The Mummy 3, What Happens in Vegas and Sex and the City each beat The Dark Knight in a single week. It's simply too dark and heavy for the region's audience. They like attractive stars, mindless action and plenty of light fun.

Post 6

Maybe they also think christian bale sucks the cock?

Post 7

Yeah a lot of people love him as Batman... I'm not convinced. He's fine I guess, in the sense he doesn't really detract from the movie, but I'm sure they could have casted the role better.

Post 8

Dark Knight has nothing on Titanic...... if Leo died before Titanic aired then it would have made heaps more as for Heath he was ok nothing award winning

Post 9

Heath Ledger's death adds nothing nor takes anything away from his outstanding performance as the joker - it was easily his best. His performance will most certainly be award winning, and rightly so.

His death quite obviously has added to the box-office takings though, there's no denying that, which is likely due to the media coverage surrounding his death and his involvement in The Dark Knight. Even acknowledging that, it doesn't make the movie any less of an amazing acomplishment; a revitalisation and reinvention of the comic book movie genre at very, very least.

As for Titanic being a better movie - I always knew you were gay.

Post 10

Dont hate the Player HATE the game

:P

Post 11

Was good a movie but more of it should have ended up on the cutting room floor.

Post 12

I couldn't disagree more, I've just come back from watching it and I want to go back again tonight because I know I could pick up on lots of things that I missed the first time around. Maybe you have a short attention span but there is no way they could have cut a minute from this film and still have the same plot/character development.

Its been a long time since I've seen a film that flows and builds with such evenness as well as this. It truly is an achievement. Its not going to win the Oscar for best film, nor should it, there is just not enough depth, but for the genre we are dealing with here it is head and shoulders above the rest.

Ledger was remarkable and deserves an Oscar for best supporting actor not best actor if that makes sense.

I like Christian bale and think he suits the role well. He's not an A-lister and I think that's good. An A list actor's performance (one way or the other) could detract from the film itself. Having said that, Maggie Gyllenhaal was terrible.

Post 13

Quote from ResLo;352318:
Having said that, Maggie Gyllenhaal was terrible.

She definitely was the weakest link. I reckon Oldman hasn't got enough attention for his role... he was number 2 next to Ledger as far has hitting the character bang on I reckon...

Post 14

I was surprised he took it on in the first place. The film is of course all the better for his presence, Morgan freeman too.

Post 15

oldman is all sorts of awesome in pretty much everything he's ever been in. even lost in space

Post 16

Just found out that Christian bale is the new John Connor.

Terminator Salvation due in 2009 - After Skynet has destroyed much of humanity in a nuclear holocaust, a group of survivors led by John Connor (Bale) struggles to keep the machines from finishing the job.

Post 17

hmmm maybe i should go see this film at the cinema.

Post 18

The Dark Knight? You'd be a fool not to.

Post 19

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/

this is the list i'd deal with :P still got a bit to go. but it was an excellent movie :) im just glad it beat spiderman.

Post 20

thank **** it will beat star wars jarjar edition in the worldwide list

Post 21

That's an interesting list.
I'd be interested to see some sort of "inflation corrected" figures for ET and Star Wars though.

Post 22

which is why boxofficemojo rocks so hard :)

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm

but on those lists, star wars and ET have both had multiple releases

Post 23

Yeah 1939 puts Gone with the wind always owning everyone else when it comes to inflation, its an awesome site if you look around at some of the lists.

i can't find it now, but i found a list that listed movies by profit percetage. and The Blair Witch Project was around 400,000% returned lol. Cost $60,000 to make, and has made a quarter of a billion dollars.

and isnt it funny, the best movie on the all time adjusted list from the year 2000 onwards is The Dark Knight at 29, and it might be the biggest movie ever by the way its going.

Post 24

boxofficemojo + HSX == win =)

Post 25

Quote from Aegis;352375:
which is why boxofficemojo rocks so hard :)

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm

but on those lists, star wars and ET have both had multiple releases

You know looking at that list, the top 25 really makes some sense to me - there's some seriously big movies there, and very few I haven't seen.

Post 26

No.15 The Sting is a surprise to me. That's a film I came across late one night. I've seen it about 3-4 times now still like it, but never thought it would be that big a grossing film.

Post 27

A quick search reveals it won 7 oscars, so it was definitely the real deal.
That's one of the few I don't recall seeing.