Would everyone prefer it if it were 5v5 or 4v4 for the LANded CS Comp?
Thanks
Quantum
LANded IV Tournaments
6 public posts in this discussion.
Post 2
I belive 5v5 two teams 3 and 2 makes for interseting play [Image: http://bbs.gamers.octa4.net.au/smile.gif]
Two go one way and three go the other way !
[This message has been edited by TrustNo1 (edited 07-07-2001).]
Post 3
now here we observe the primitive TOB tactics [Image: http://bbs.gamers.octa4.net.au/biggrin.gif]
4v4 5v5 all the same but ill go with 5v5.... Lock it in eddy [Image: http://bbs.gamers.octa4.net.au/biggrin.gif]
Post 4
"2 go one way, 3 the other..."
Now we know why TOB own so hard! [Image: http://bbs.gamers.octa4.net.au/smile.gif]
5v5 better...
Post 5
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by R3COIL:
[b]"2 go one way, 3 the other..."
Now we know why TOB own so hard! [img]http://bbs.gamers.octa4.net.au/smile.gif[/img]
5v5 better...[/b]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Our tactics vary and we are perfecting it to make it as fluid as water... The merits when we split our group are <UL TYPE=SQUARE>
<LI>[b]stronger defense [/b]- for de_maps
<LI>[b]better map coverage [/b]- for cs_maps
[/list]
All we need as a [i]real quality time clan practice[/i].
Post 6
No one plays CS_ maps in tournaments, not in serious ones anyway. There is no point praccing them.
It's also not the best idea to split your group, esspecially if attacking - But different situations call for different tactics, and tactics may need to be changed mid-match numerous times.
Sometimes a decoy works wonders. Sure he is like a sacraficial lamb, but it helps us get the bomb down, and that's what matters.