[Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj39HdtOB5U]
Windows 8 to feature drastically reduced boot time, shown off in video -- Engadget
37 public posts in this discussion.
[Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj39HdtOB5U]
Windows 8 to feature drastically reduced boot time, shown off in video -- Engadget
Nice,
Wonder if it will be slow in a networked environment.
Wow, that's pretty damn quick.
But how quick will it be after a few months worth of registry bloating :p
It's not finished yet, that's just the boot time before they put all the windows in it.
Just the time it takes to load the login screen you reckon? :P
Well according to the stories, they don't even load explorer at boot, loading a desktop is optional.
I was implying that all they have there is prototype edition, they haven't put all the windowsness into the operating system yet. Plenty of time for them to fuck it up.
So then it's 10seconds to boot to the login screen; then fuck knows how long to actually LOAD windows after logging in?
Knew it was too good to be true :/
"Please wait install update 1 of 200".........
..
...
...
"Finished installing all Windows updates, restarting your machine"....
The ironic thing i find with Windows user group is installing updates when you shut down your machine. Then it throws a brick in your face and say "Installing updates do NOT turn off your machine". I want to turn off my machine thats why I fucken shut it down.... Fuck me, out of all the stupid places to put a installing latest updates.
[Image: http://tapatalk.com/mu/7cab464c-88ee-3d3a.jpg]
Tell me that you all didn't miss the porn to the left of her head. Next to the arrow. Fap fap fap!!
---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-12.387398,130.851833
- Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Err, that's not a picture of what you think it is.
dude, how long have you been at sea??
Everything you need to know about Windows 8 in 8 minutes:
[Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=d9AdL1aBp8w]
the guy presenting at the 4min mark sounded like Jesse's dumbass mate from breaking bad...
but yeah, buzzwords.. metro? charms? fucking hipsters designing this shit.
and wow.. he demoed dragging a window onto anther monitor like it was a big thing??
Developer version avail for DL
Windows Dev Center
When you press the windows key instead of opening the start menu it opens another screen which has a bunch of brightly coloured tiles that take up so much space that they don’t even fit on the screen, you have to scroll across just to look at them all.
Alt + F4 no longer works to close said apps, infact I am yet to find a way to close an app.
System settings are hidden away behind an infinite layer of colourful boxes and annoying pop ups
Quote from Aegis;400423:
and wow.. he demoed dragging a window onto anther monitor like it was a big thing??
I think the funky thing was that the taskbar updated on the second screen with the app he dragged over to there.
wow.. that's so innovative i just crapped my pants =)
I can't wait to try it. If BF3 weren't right around the corner I'd go for it... but I don't want to risk incompatibility/performance issues.
Dual boot rec?
I see a whole lot of gay bright colourful hipster shit and a whole bunch of "Move mouse too close menu now covering screen" bullshit.
I also see a lot of "This is what we think you want when using this and thats all you get".
Edit: I do like the new Task Manager though
Guide to Installing and Booting Windows 8 Developer Preview off a VHD (Virtual Hard Disk) - Scott Hanselman
Yeah I'm really not impressed by anything they're showing me.
If anything, it looks far more complicated than it ever should be. I'm not interested in anything resembling WMC; because it's fucking horrible.
So is that laptop in the first video running a mechanical HDD or an SSD? That would be helpful to know.
(Criticism directed @ Windows bitch, not OP)
bound to be an ssd
Bump.
Seems latest reports are that the Start Menu has been well and truly killed where the to code for it is all being removed.
So that means users are stuck with the Metro interface. Windows of giant coloured blocks.
awesome - i look forward to trying to tell users how to open a DOS prompt on it then..
Just type cmd :0
Quote from Aegis;406806:
awesome - i look forward to trying to tell users how to open a DOS prompt on it then..
Windows button on the keyboard and R at the same time. Works most times - appart from when they are on a Mac.
So to me it looks like the old argument "At least I can get into the crux of the system" is no longer relevant. It also appears as though they've gone too far to dumb down the system. 99% of users don't need to access the C drive really, let Windows manage their shit, and when it goes wrong, just uninstall and reinstall again.
Yeah, no. I'm off Windows for good now, just no point in using it except for gaming for me.
EDIT: Just to add, I have solid state in my mac, and it boots up about the same as that, but that's from full shut down. My guess it's not from full shutdown there, judging by the flash of that new user interface prior to login. That stinks of being in a ready state shutdown. Where all power is off, but it recalls where it was before (ie, all it does is load the image off the SSD and away she goes).
I think for the vast majority of people now, that if it booted straight into a web browser before anything else they would be happy. For the vast majority of people I've seen, and talked to all they want to do is log into web mail, check facebook, play some online games and do some word processing.
For me, depending on what Mac world does next week with their retina display technology for the Mac book Air, and also Mac Book pro I think I will be purchasing a Mac on this one issue. The new Ribbon user interface, also the new Metro look just feels very off putting. I've grown up with tables, and color separation. So to suddenly see the new interface the same pale color of black, grey, or as some put it "Red, Yellow sausage stand" I think the barrier to entry to Mac's have been removed.
I am using the Windows8 RC on my laptop.
Its terrible.
Starting configuration, 15.4", 2.3Ghz processor, 8GB RAM, GT 650M 1GB, 256GB flash... $2199
220 pixels per inch, 5,184,000 pixels.
15.4" across, pixel density is 2880x1800.
Seems like, I'm going over to mac.
As long as you don't intend on any high-end gaming.
Quote from chad;406817:
Starting configuration, 15.4", 2.3Ghz processor, 8GB RAM, GT 650M 1GB, 256GB flash... $2199
220 pixels per inch, 5,184,000 pixels.
15.4" across, pixel density is 2880x1800.
Seems like, I'm going over to mac.
Or, you could, like, stick with Windows 7? :roll:
Quote from Milenko;406818:
As long as you don't intend on any high-end gaming.
That is kind of funny, I thought high end gaming moved to the xbox, and mostly the game market cross hairs is aimed at the console market.
jebus, chad, your stupid really levels up exponentially - following your logic the ACTUAL highend gamers are the Farmville lovers...
Quote from chad;406820:
That is kind of funny, I thought high end gaming moved to the xbox, and mostly the game market cross hairs is aimed at the console market.
Err nope :P
I take it you don't game a whole bunch these days :P
The Console market is definitely thriving, although some could argue on a downward trend atm (especially with no new consoles on the immediate horizon - WiiU doesn't count!)
The new iMacs would be stressed running BF3 @ 1920x1080 max detail.
The GT650M is benchmark comparable to the GT570 Nvidia chip-set. While a big step up, I wouldn't be surprised if you would need to use a Thunderbolt set up to make the next gen of games run at a playable frame rate. Although from what I've read - Thunderbolt doesn't like any GPU drawing more than 150W.