[Image: http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~rainwulf/images/shocking.jpg]
this is my laptop ;)
the first time i ran it i got a BSOD.......
and i lost my 44 day uptime!!!!
;(
3dmark record!!!! beat this!!!!
22 public posts in this discussion.
Post 2
Show that score with pride!
Post 3
it was painful to watch.....
celeron 850, trident cyberblade i1, 320 meg ram ;)
8 meg SHARED ram hahahaha
poor laptop.
Post 4
I saw a site a while ago that had screenies of 3dmark, although they were erm, 'tweaked' (:lol:) using the HL speed hack thingy-whatsit.
He got 60000 for the top score, and 4 marks for the low score.
But i'd say you hold the record for the lowest unaltered score.
Congratulations :wink:
Post 5
i would like to thank my parents, and my mum and dad, and my dog........
:D :D
Post 6
Actually, I've seen a 220 (Celeron 300MHz, nVidia Riva TNT, 64MB SDRAM)
And if I wanted to, I could switch my machine over to using MesaGL indirect (Software OpenGL implementation) and see how things go with my proc doing all the work.
But I gotta give you credit for one thing - anyone else who got such a score wouldn't be showing it off.
Post 7
Notice how we can't see the taskbar with Photoshop minimised?
I often wonder how people can get scores these high - I simply won't believe it till I see a "compare" link. :wink:
Post 8
i would run it again, but i dont have all day ;)
i could do a compare link too, cos i have an account with madonion ;)
and a tnt2? thats should blow that score area...
Post 9
Quote from Aravi D'teron:
Actually, I've seen a 220 (Celeron 300MHz, nVidia Riva TNT, 64MB SDRAM)
And if I wanted to, I could switch my machine over to using MesaGL indirect (Software OpenGL implementation) and see how things go with my proc doing all the work.
But I gotta give you credit for one thing - anyone else who got such a score wouldn't be showing it off.
3dmark.. is direct3d.
Post 10
Ah, but if I use WineX, then those direct3d function calls get translated to OpenGL.
Post 11
thats performance for you!!! 8) :lol:
Post 12
I'd like to see Windows try to do the same thing. :lol::lol::lol:
Post 13
why? we got directx.
no need for translation.
Post 14
I was talking about the "CPU emulating a GPU as well as doing its part" component.
Post 15
why would i want to do that though.
Post 16
Quote from Rainwulf A'Kahnon:
why would i want to do that though.
For this reason :)
Quote from Rainwulf A'Kahnon:
.... trident cyberblade i1....
Post 17
i am sure the celeron 850 would beat it !
Post 18
Quote from Rainwulf A'Kahnon:
i am sure the celeron 850 would beat it !
No but Aravi's would :roll: :lol:
Post 19
nope,i'm sorry i don't have a pic but i think i might have been close with my old system
Celeron 500
128pc 100
tnt1
slot board
i got pretty DAMN LOW!!! i don't remember exactly
Post 20
Lowest i have seen was a 0
POS compaq k6-500
onboard trident blade 8mb shared
312mb ram
the low detail car chase got about 2-3 frames in the good bits...
the high detail just crashed the comp :P
even in 640x480 :P
Post 21
it must complete the benchmark! or it doesnt count ;)
Post 22
My 1.8ghz gets 800 marks in 2000. It's a shitbox and is going back as soon as I phone the guy.